If you want to make money from short form content, two platforms are probably somewhere on your radar: Facebook Reels and YouTube Shorts.
Both platforms give creators an opportunity to take short videos and turn views into actual platform income. Both can generate millions of views. Both can help you grow an audience. And unlike simply hoping a brand discovers your Instagram account and offers you a sponsorship, both have monetization systems that can directly reward eligible creators for content performanc. But the experience of making money on Facebook Reels versus YouTube Shorts can be VERY different. I’ve been a content creator for almost eight years. I have multiple monetized channels, have earned a full time income from content creation, and coach pet content creators who have channels of all different sizes. That means I’ve had the opportunity not only to study my own analytics, but also to see what other creators are experiencing.
And if you asked me whether Facebook Reels or YouTube Shorts is better for monetization, my answer would be: Facebook may give you a faster opportunity to make money. YouTube can be harder to monetize, but I prefer it for building a more predictable long term creator business. That distinction matters. Because the platform that can make you money fastest is not necessarily the platform I would choose if I were thinking about where I want my creator business to be several years from now.
Facebook Reels vs YouTube Shorts Monetization
The biggest difference between these two platforms is how creators experience the path to monetization. Facebook has its content monetization ecosystem and may provide monetization opportunities to creators relatively early in their journey, depending on eligibility and the programs available to their account.
YouTube uses the YouTube Partner Program, and earning ad revenue through Shorts requires creators to meet YouTube’s eligibility requirements. That creates two very different experiences. Facebook can feel like immediate gratification. You start posting. Something performs well. Monetization opportunities appear. Suddenly you are thinking, “Wait, I can actually make money doing this!”
YouTube can feel like delayed gratification. You create videos. You build subscribers. You accumulate views. You continue publishing. And depending on your path to Partner Program eligibility, it may take months before your channel begins generating meaningful platform revenue. That can make Facebook incredibly appealing to a new creator.
But there is another side to this comparison.
Once you are monetized on YouTube, I find the relationship between views and income considerably easier to understand and plan around than my experience with Facebook. That predictability matters if your goal is building a business rather than simply earning occasional bonus money from viral videos.
Facebook Can Be Easier for New Creators to Monetize
One of the reasons I would not tell creators to ignore Facebook is that newer creators can have significant opportunities there. I have multiple Facebook pages, including established pages and experimental channels that I use to test what newer creators may experience. Across those accounts, I have personally seen major differences in monetization.
For example, I have experienced periods where a Facebook page received approximately 3 million views and earned around $800. For a newer creator, that can be incredibly exciting. Imagine creating short-form videos, hitting a few million views, and suddenly seeing hundreds of dollars appear from content you were already posting.
Of course you are going to think: “I need to do more of this!” And you should! But there is one enormous warning I give creators when it comes to Facebook: Do not assume today’s earnings predict tomorrow’s earnings.
Facebook Reels Income Can Be Extremely Unpredictable
This is where my biggest frustration with Facebook monetization comes in. I’ve had Facebook pages that have existed for several years receive approximately 10 to 12 million views in a month and earn less than $100. Compare that with the example of roughly 3 million views earning around $800. It does not feel logical. More than three times as many views can result in dramatically less money.
That is why I joke that sometimes the math simply does not math with Facebook. There can be many factors involved in platform payouts. Audience, eligible or qualified views, engagement, distribution, advertising conditions, and other variables can affect what a creator ultimately earns. I’ve also personally observed newer and established pages having very different monetization experiences. What I do NOT want you to take from this is that there is some simple public rule saying every new Facebook creator automatically gets paid more than every established creator.
There isn’t a simple formula like that that you should build your business around. Instead, my point is: Your Facebook payout can change dramatically, even when your views remain strong or increase. That makes forecasting difficult.
Why Facebook’s Unpredictability Matters
Let’s say you have a fantastic Facebook month. You make $800. The next month, you make $1,200. Then you make $1,500.
It becomes very tempting to think: “Okay, I make about $1,000 to $1,500 per month from Facebook now.”
But what happens if your next month generates even more views and your income drops? This is exactly why creators have to be careful about treating short-term Facebook income like a salary. A few good months are wonderful. They are not necessarily proof of what you will earn for the next year. If you are trying to turn content creation into your full-time career, predictability starts becoming much more important. You have bills. You have taxes. You have business expenses. You may eventually have contractors or employees. You need some ability to understand what your business can realistically generate. Virality is exciting. Predictable revenue is what helps build an actual business.
How YouTube Shorts Monetization Is Different
YouTube Shorts are also short-form vertical videos, but monetization operates within YouTube’s larger Partner Program ecosystem. The difficult part? You have to qualify. And if your strategy relies heavily on Shorts, reaching the necessary view and subscriber thresholds can require a LOT of consistent content and strong performance.
As someone who has created short-form content for years, I do not want to sugarcoat this. Getting millions of views sounds easy when you spend all day seeing viral videos on your feed. It isn’t. Getting one video to go viral is one thing. Generating huge amounts of views repeatedly across a 90-day period is another. That is why YouTube can require much more delayed gratification than Facebook. You may spend six months, nine months, or a year building before your channel reaches the point where the revenue starts feeling meaningful. But I personally think there is value in that delayed gratification.
How Much Do YouTube Shorts Pay?
This is one of the questions creators always want a simple answer to. How much money does one million YouTube Shorts views make? The answer still varies. Your audience, niche, location, eligible views, advertising conditions, and other factors can influence your actual revenue. On my own pet channels, millions of Shorts views can generate hundreds of dollars, but I would never promise another creator an exact amount based solely on their view count.
What I like about YouTube, though, is that once you have enough personal data, you can start learning what your own channel tends to generate. You can look at your historical performance. You can compare views with revenue. You can understand how your audience behaves. You can gradually build a more useful expectation around what different types of videos may generate.
That does not mean every YouTube month will be identical. It means I find YouTube’s monetization ecosystem easier to understand and forecast within my own creator business. And I value that tremendously.
YouTube Shorts Still Don’t Pay Like Long Form YouTube
There is another major piece of this conversation that I cannot ignore. Even though we are comparing Facebook Reels with YouTube Shorts, creators need to understand that YouTube Shorts and long-form YouTube content have very different earning potential.
On one of my channels, I receive millions of views on short-form content. That sounds fantastic. And it is! But the platform revenue from those Shorts is not necessarily life-changing. Long-form content is where YouTube becomes especially interesting to me. A longer video provides more opportunities for monetization, stronger viewer relationships, deeper storytelling, search discovery, and continued traffic long after the original publishing date.
In my experience, long-form content can generate dramatically more revenue per view than Shorts. That means YouTube gives you somewhere to grow. You might begin with Shorts. You build an audience. You learn storytelling. You become comfortable creating videos. Then you begin incorporating long-form content.
Now you are not simply trying to create viral clips. You are building a library. And that is a completely different business model.
Facebook Reels Can Win for Faster Monetization
So let’s actually give Facebook its credit here. If you are brand new and your number one goal is: “I want an opportunity to make money from my short-form content as soon as possible.”
Facebook may be incredibly attractive. You can create a Facebook page. You can begin posting. You can repurpose content you are already making for other platforms. And depending on your account and eligibility, monetization opportunities may become available without requiring the same Shorts-based path into the YouTube Partner Program. That is valuable!
I don’t want my frustration with Meta to translate into telling creators they should ignore Facebook. Actually, I recommend almost the opposite. If you’re creating the content anyway, why wouldn’t you give it another place to make money?
YouTube Shorts Win for the Long-Term Strategy
If you ask which platform I personally prefer, however, I’m choosing YouTube. Not because it is easier. It isn’t. Not because Shorts immediately make massive amounts of money. They usually don’t. I prefer YouTube because I like the ecosystem creators can build around it.
You can start with Shorts. You can expand into long-form. You can build searchable content. You can create evergreen videos. You can develop an audience that watches you for several minutes instead of several seconds. You can gradually create a catalog of content that continues generating views. And once you understand your own channel’s monetization, you can begin making more informed decisions about your creator business. Facebook gives me more immediate opportunity. YouTube gives me more confidence in the long-term direction. That is the difference.
The Real Problem With Choosing Only One
Here is where I think creators sometimes approach this conversation incorrectly. They ask: “Should I do Facebook OR YouTube?” Why does it have to be either? If you are making vertical short-form content, one video may potentially be adapted for multiple platforms.
You can post on Facebook. You can post on YouTube. You can build both audiences. You can give yourself multiple opportunities for discovery. You can create multiple potential income streams. This is especially important because creator income is inherently unpredictable. Diversification is one of the best protections you can build into your influencer business.
If Facebook has a terrible month, YouTube may perform well. If YouTube Shorts slow down, a brand partnership may come through. If sponsorships are quiet, affiliate income may help. If platform income changes, your digital products may continue selling. You do not want your entire financial life depending on one algorithm.
Start Facebook for Today and YouTube for Tomorrow
If I were advising a brand new creator who wanted to make money with short-form videos, I would not tell them to choose. I would tell them to start both. Think of Facebook as one potential opportunity to monetize the content you are already creating.
At the same time, start building YouTube. Maybe YouTube does not pay you immediately. That’s okay. Six months from now, you may be much closer to monetization. Nine months from now, your library is larger. A year from now, you may have an entirely new income stream.
Meanwhile, Facebook may have already generated revenue along the way. You can take advantage of Facebook’s short term opportunity while building toward YouTube’s longer term potential. That is a much stronger strategy than putting everything into one platform.
Don’t Judge YouTube After 30 Days
This is one of the biggest mistakes I see newer creators make. They start YouTube. They post for three weeks. Nothing dramatic happens. Then they decide YouTube “doesn’t work.”
YouTube often requires patience. If your entire content creation mindset is based on immediate gratification, it can feel painfully slow. But that does not mean nothing is happening. You’re learning titles. You’re learning thumbnails. You’re improving retention. You’re discovering what topics your audience wants. You’re learning how to create stronger hooks. You’re building a content library. You’re gaining subscribers. All of those things compound.
Then, eventually you have enough data and enough content that the channel begins behaving very differently than it did during month one. Delayed gratification does not mean wasted effort. Sometimes it means you are building an asset instead of chasing a spike.
Use Shorts to Learn What Your Audience Wants
Another benefit of posting short-form content on both Facebook and YouTube is the amount of audience data you can collect. Pay attention to which topics repeatedly perform well.
What gets shared?
What gets comments?
Which videos hold attention?
Which recurring storylines keep working?
Which pet behaviors are your audience obsessed with?
Those insights can eventually inform your longer-form strategy too. Maybe a 20-second Short about a weird breed characteristic explodes. Could that become a five or eight-minute YouTube video? Maybe viewers constantly comment questions about your pet’s behavior. Could those questions become searchable long-form videos? Short-form content can become your testing ground. Instead of thinking about every Reel or Short as an isolated piece of content, use it to learn what your audience is telling you.
Don’t Chase Views Without Building a Business
There is a bigger lesson underneath this entire Facebook Reels versus YouTube Shorts conversation.
Views are not the business. Views are attention. Your job is figuring out what you are going to build with that attention. You could get 10 million views and make very little platform revenue. You could get fewer views and close a fantastic brand partnership. You could build a smaller YouTube audience that generates consistent long-form revenue. You could use short-form content to grow an email list.
You could generate affiliate sales. You could sell a digital product. You could attract brands. The creator who understands monetization beyond views has a much stronger business than the creator who simply chases the biggest number on the analytics screen. That is why I talk about diversification so much.
Which Is Better for Pet Content Creators?
For pet creators specifically, I think there is a strong argument for using both. Pet content is incredibly compatible with short-form video. Funny behaviors. Relatable moments. Cute interactions. Storytelling. Training. Educational information. Product demonstrations. Pet owner struggles. There is an almost endless supply of ideas that can work in vertical video.
That means your content can potentially serve multiple purposes. A funny cat video can become a Facebook Reel and a YouTube Short. A product video can build an audience while also supporting affiliate revenue. A recurring storyline can introduce viewers to your pet before they eventually watch your longer YouTube content. Do not think only about today’s payout. Think about the ecosystem you are creating around your pet.
Facebook Reels vs YouTube Shorts: Which Should You Choose?
If you absolutely forced me to choose only one platform for my long-term creator business, I would choose YouTube. But if you asked me what I think a new creator should actually do?
Start both.
Facebook can potentially give you monetization opportunities earlier. YouTube may require significantly more patience before meaningful monetization begins. But YouTube also gives you the ability to expand beyond Shorts and build a larger long-term content library. There is no reason you cannot benefit from both approaches.
Post the short-form content. Learn from the analytics. Build your Facebook page. Build your YouTube channel. Then continue developing other revenue streams alongside both. That is how you start turning content creation into an actual business.
Need More Help? We’re Here to Help!
If you’re a newer pet creator and all of this feels like a LOT, Petfluencer Foundations is designed to help you understand how these pieces work together. We cover content strategy, brand pillars, storytelling, audience growth, monetization, platform strategy, hooks, profile optimization, and how to build a pet influencer brand instead of randomly throwing content onto every social media platform and hoping something works. You also get access to coaching and a community of pet creators who can help you learn and grow.
If you already have an established audience and want to focus more heavily on monetization, 6-Figure Pet Influencer dives deeper into paid partnerships, pricing, pitching, negotiation, brand relationships, and building a creator business with multiple income streams.
And if this comparison has you thinking, “Okay, maybe I really DO need to take YouTube seriously,” YouTube Strategy is where we go deeper into titles, thumbnails, storytelling, retention, long form video, monetization, and building a channel designed for long term growth.
You don’t have to figure out every platform overnight. You just need to start building!
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Facebook Reels or YouTube Shorts pay more?
There is no universal winner because Facebook payouts can vary substantially between creators and over time, while YouTube Shorts revenue also varies by channel, audience, and other factors. In my experience, Facebook can provide attractive early monetization opportunities, while I find YouTube more useful for building a predictable long-term creator strategy.
How much can you make from 1 million YouTube Shorts views?
There is no guaranteed amount for one million Shorts views. Earnings vary depending on the channel, audience, niche, eligible views, and monetization conditions. Your own historical YouTube analytics are more useful for forecasting than another creator’s earnings screenshot.
How much can you make from 1 million Facebook Reels views?
Again, there is no guaranteed payout. I’ve personally experienced major differences in effective earnings across my own Facebook pages, which is why I do not recommend using a universal Facebook pay per million views estimate.
Is Facebook easier to monetize than YouTube?
For some newer creators, Facebook may provide monetization opportunities earlier. YouTube’s Partner Program has specific eligibility requirements that creators need to reach before receiving the full monetization opportunities associated with the program.
Is it hard to monetize YouTube Shorts?
It can be. Building subscribers and generating consistently high Shorts view counts requires strong content and patience. A single viral video does not necessarily mean you can reproduce that performance every 90 days.
Do YouTube Shorts make as much money as long-form videos?
In my own experience, no. My long form YouTube content can generate significantly more revenue per view than Shorts, which is one reason I encourage creators to eventually consider building both formats.
Should I post the same video on Facebook Reels and YouTube Shorts?
Repurposing short-form videos across platforms can be an efficient strategy. You should still consider the audience and features of each platform, but one piece of content can often be adapted for several channels.
Can you make a full-time income from short-form content?
It is possible, but I would not recommend relying on platform payouts alone. A stronger creator business usually combines platform revenue with additional income sources such as sponsorships, affiliate marketing, products, memberships, or other opportunities.
Is YouTube worth starting if I am already making money on Facebook?
I think so. Facebook income can fluctuate, and YouTube gives you another audience and another potential revenue stream. It also gives you the option to expand into long-form content later.
Which platform should a new pet influencer start with?
If possible, I recommend building both. Facebook may offer more immediate opportunities, while YouTube gives you a platform you can continue developing for the long-term.
Final Thoughts
Facebook Reels and YouTube Shorts can both make money. They simply offer two very different creator experiences. Facebook may give you faster gratification. YouTube may make you wait. Facebook payouts can feel incredibly exciting when your account is performing well. YouTube can require months of work before you feel like you are getting much back.
But I personally value what happens after that waiting period. I want a creator business where I can look at my historical performance, understand my content, develop long-form videos, build a library, and create multiple ways for my work to continue generating income. That is why YouTube wins for me long-term.
But Facebook still has a place in my strategy. And if you’re starting today, I don’t think you need to choose. Use Facebook to create opportunities now. Build YouTube for the opportunities you want later. Then diversify beyond both. Because the real goal is not figuring out which platform will pay you the most for one viral video. The goal is creating a content business that can continue paying you long after that viral video is gone.
